Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Lessig on his Eldred Defeat
posted by mpawlo on Wednesday March 03, @10:11AM
from the interesting-people dept.
Copyright In an article named "How I lost the big one", Professor Lawrence Lessig, recounts the outcome in the Eric Eldred case. Greplaw readers sometimes criticize me for referring to Lessig as Eeyore, but following this statement, do you really blame me?

Lessig states:

'We had in our Constitution a commitment to free culture. In the case that I fathered, the Supreme Court effectively renounced that commitment. A better lawyer would have made them see differently.'

Lessig continues in - as described by Copyfight's Donna Wentworth - his 'Eldred post-mortem' claiming to be a failure as lawyer in the Eldred case, because he did not fully appreciate the practical, non-academic side of the case - Lessig could not make the judges see the practical harm of letting congress extend copyright.

Mikael Pawlo's comment: Having listened to Lessig on numerous occasions since 1998 and forward, I have a hard time believing that anyone would have done a better job arguing the case. However, I do agree with Lessig that he could be a better lawyer. A good lawyer would not keep repeating his mistakes in public. A good lawyer would continue in pursuing his client’s cause instead of repeating his client’s defeat. A good lawyer would not make himself look like Eeyore in Winnie the Pooh. It may be an interesting read and great stuff for law students, but I think Lessig would do more good should he focus on pursuing other goals instead of trying to put down in words why he lost the Eldred case. The Eldred case was lost. Now, let’s move on. Leave the analysis to others. There is a million copyright battles to be fought. Lessig to battle stations! Now!

Read Professor Lessig's article in Legal Affairs.

Iuliano on Copyright Arbitrational Panel | Consent for Underage Data Trade  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • Professor Lawrence Lessig
  • Eric Eldred case
  • referring to Lessig as Eeyore
  • Copyfight's Donna Wentworth
  • Mikael Pawlo's
  • Professor Lessig's article in Legal Affairs
  • More on Copyright
  • Also by mpawlo
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Lessig on his Eldred Defeat | Login/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Law practice (Score:1)
    by darkonc on Wednesday March 03, @06:51PM (#1496)
    User #463 Info
    I'm not a lawyer, but I have represented my self in a couple of cases. In one of the cases, I lost because I was essentially hoodwinked by the other side (both the crown and the judge). As I was bemoaning the fact that I hadn't seen the broadside coming (I was reasonably sure that I had my law and authorities down pat), a lawyer friend of mine (he couldn't represent me because he was involved in another aspect of the case) said, "yeah, well that's why they call it a 'practice'".
    Failure analysis (Score:1)
    by TFBW on Wednesday March 03, @09:47PM (#1497)
    User #844 Info | http://www.nutters.org/user/famous
    I'd have thought that failure analysis was an essential part of avoiding future failures. Or is the "fire enough bullets and you're sure to hit something" approach considered preferable in legal circles?

    The pontification continues at Nutters.org [nutters.org].

    Re:Failure analysis (Score:1)
    by darkonc on Thursday March 04, @02:17AM (#1498)
    User #463 Info
    Analyzing a failure is a good thing. Wallowing in it (e.g. claiming that he's a failure) may be counter-productive if it leads to you being gun shy. I think that the percieved problem is that Lessig may now be spending too much time/energy on the past failure, and starting to neglect the challenges ahead.

    Hopefully it's an incorrect perception, but if it's not, it needs to be addressed.

    Re:Failure analysis (Score:2)
    by mpawlo on Thursday March 04, @03:16PM (#1499)
    User #42 Info | http://www.pawlo.com/
    My point exactly. It is also my strong belief that failure analysis is best conducted by others, especially when it comes to public perfomances. But I wish to be wrong.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]