Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
McCarthy in Software Patents Defense
posted by mpawlo on Saturday June 14, @10:28AM
from the patently-absurd dept.
News Labour MP Arlene McCarthy has replied to Stallman and Hills' article on software patents. Our computer use is being threatened by a wild west-style land grab that only the rich giants can win according to Richard M Stallman and Nick Hill. In a piece published by The Guardian Stallman and Hill argued that software patents will 'lead to job losses, higher prices, and less choice'. In her reply, MP McCarthy states that 'we must legislate to ensure our inventors are not put at a disadvantage in the global market place.'

Read Arlene McCarthy's article in The Guardian.

Read Stallman and Hills' article in The Guardian.

Read also previous Greplaw article Software patents stink.

Follow discussion at Slashdot.

CAPPS II Dead? | Open Reply to McCarthy  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • Slashdot
  • Arlene McCarthy's article
  • Stallman and Hills' article
  • Software patents stink
  • discussion at Slashdot
  • More on News
  • Also by mpawlo
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    McCarthy in Software Patents Defense | Login/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    A Tug of War (Score:1)
    by Dave on Saturday June 14, @04:20PM (#800)
    User #720 Info
    Setting software patents aside for a moment, Ms. McCarthy has raised an interesting point. The United States is more actively passing legislation on IP than anyone I can think of. Because of multi-national corporations and improvements in transportation and communication, laws and cultures of super powers effect each other. Whichever direction Europe takes, they need to act sooner rather than later to ensure that they are able to decide for themselves. If Europe sits on its hands, it may well be forced to take (harmonize) with the U.S., whereas if both sides bring legislation to the table Europe will be able to instead have the U.S. harmonize with them.

    Ms. McCarthy doesn't seem particularly powerful or informed; I doubt she will have much say, but the effects of a global economy are very real.

    What's the debate all about? (Score:1)
    by A Proud American on Saturday June 14, @05:46PM (#801)
    User #684 Info
    Personally, I've always preferred John and Ringo anyway.

    What's the fuss all about?

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]