Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Spammers Using Legit Reply-To Emails
posted by scubacuda on Sunday June 01, @11:43PM
from the <B>Cl<!I>i<!D>ck-h<!H>er<!J>e<!R> dept.
News Another reason to NEVER respond to spam: spammers are using known good e-mails as reply-to addresses. (Probably the most well known forged return address involved Tracy LaQuey Parker, then owner of Flowers.com. The flood shut down her ISP for half a day, hurting her business, as people believed Parker's business was responsible.) Says Andrew Barrett, executive director of the SpamCon Foundation:
"Most of the recent generation of ratware [spamming software] will randomly insert addresses off the list as the purported sender. [This technique] flies under the radar because it avoids sending [all of the] bounces to a single domain."

Scamming a Nigerian Scammer | G2 Signs on Baghdad Blogger  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • Another reason
  • Tracy LaQuey Parker
  • Flowers.com
  • Andrew Barrett
  • SpamCon Foundation
  • More on News
  • Also by scubacuda
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Spammers Using Legit Reply-To Emails | Login/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Quite correct (Score:1)
    by lawjournal on Tuesday June 03, @06:39AM (#720)
    User #692 Info | http://law.papr.org/
    And don't forget spammed promotion of unknowing websites.

    I've been seeing, as the stigma against spam grows, that the best way to knock someone off the net is to just spam ADVERTISING their site. A quick 50-100k messages and you'll have a ton of idiots who think they know what they're doing beating down some poor guys ISP demanding he's shut down.

    The poor ISP, being a kid of 14 is very likely these days, gets scared and shuts down the site for safety precautions. Site owner's hosed.

    Every thinks that the person mentioned in the spam in the beneficiary of the spam, and that's not necessarily the truth.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]