Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Internetbased Attacks on the Physical World
posted by scubacuda on Monday May 12, @01:04AM
from the which-spammer-is-next? dept.
Security In light of the /. backlash against Spam King, Alan Ralsky, (in which /.ers published his info online--including an overhead shot of his house--and signed him up for junk) Simon Beyers, Aviel Rubin, and David Kormann have written a report entitled Defending Against an Internetbased Attack on the Physical World. Bruce Schneier notes that there's no easy defence against such an attack, largely because companies want to make it easy for consumers to get their promotional information:
"Subscribing someone to magazines and signing them up for embarrassing catalogs is an old trick, but it has limitations because it's physically difficult to do it on a large scale. But this attack exploits the automation properties of the Internet, the Web availability of catalog request forms, and the paper world of the post office and catalog mailings. All the pieces (that) are required for the attack to work."
But as Rubin and his colleagues point out, there's a real danger in this ploy, one that few people have likely thought about.
"A scenario could be imagined where an attacker would do this to delay the arrival of an important letter, to wreak havoc on the postal system for political reasons, or even worse, to serve as a diversion for a terrorist act, such as the mailing of a contaminated letter."
/. feedback.

Cartoon Ferret Educates Kids on Piracy | Lessig on Streamcast/Grokster Decision  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • Slashdot
  • /.
  • backlash
  • Alan Ralsky
  • info online
  • overhead
  • shot
  • junk
  • report
  • Bruce Schneier
  • notes that
  • Rubin
  • /. feedback
  • More on Security
  • Also by scubacuda
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Internetbased Attacks on the Physical World | Login/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    He had it comming. (Score:1)
    by mcherm on Monday May 12, @08:17AM (#678)
    User #468 Info | http://grep.law.harvard.edu/
    Actually, I don't really see this kind of attack as a serious problem. The role of the internet here is simply to provide a way to communicate the victim's identity to a large number of outraged individuals. It is the actions of those individuals that constitutes the "attack". But such an attack will ONLY work when there are a large number of outraged individuals to exploit!

    Now, in the case of Mr. Ralsky I think I can say with some justification that he "had it comming". But few others are likely to provoke such animosity. And after the second or third time that the call goes out for a coordinated "attack" on some despised individual, anyone with the maturity of a high-school senior is likely to simply ignore the call.

    So, while I agree that Mr. Ralsky is subject to an attack against which it is nearly impossible for him to defend himself, I do NOT see the attack form as posing a serious danger to others, or a genuine "national security concern" as Rubin seems to believe.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]