|
Microsoft v. Lindows.com Summary Judgment
|
Login/Create an Account
| Top
| 5 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a good summary of the arguments at
Internet News [internetnews.com]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a motion for summary judgement which, given the prior proceedings, is likely to be granted. It is not a summary judgement.I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, however the sig limit is too small to contain i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does this mean that Lindows would be awarded some sort of monies in a countersuit against Microsoft?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very unlikely. Rule 11 sanctions are almost never given out when there is ANY sort of colorable claim, which there is here. Courts have a pretty wide discretion to award court costs, but I doubt they would be appropriate in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
