Considering how much the Church of Scientology goes on about its "rights" over its ideas/documents, one might get the impression that they intended to profit from this information.
Is not the goal of religious institutions the dissemination of their belief(s) about existence?
Are they not preventing the average person from the revelations that supposedly come from their doctrines in order to protect their monopoly?
Should governments protect copyright laws for not-for-profit institutions? I thought copyright was a monetary incentive (read: profit incentive) for creating information.
If a religious institution creates information for profit, does that not prove the lack of a divine mandate?
"I will believe you are not an animal when you do
not eat, sleep, urinate, or defecate for one month."
|