Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Microsoft Palladium Revealed
posted by mpawlo on Sunday June 23, @04:33PM
from the who-is-watching-the-watchers? dept.
Copyright Newsweek's Steven Levy has gotten a first glimpse of Palladium, Microsofts new digital rights management and passport project. Palladium is the outcome of Bill Gates' ambition to change the architecture of PCs in order to address the concerns of security, privacy and intellectual property. Palladium allegedly contains functionality for identification, verification, encryption, anti-virus, anti-spam, privacy safeguards, digital rights management and more. UPDATE: Computer security expert Richard Forno has published a response to the MSNBC article, in which criticizes Microsoft's efforts.

Macromedia Applies for OSI Certification | FBI Digs Into Reading Habits of Public Library Patrons  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • first glimpse of Palladium
  • response to the MSNBC article
  • More on Copyright
  • Also by mpawlo
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Microsoft Palladium Revealed | Login/Create an Account | Top | 3 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Infowarrior strikes again (Score:1)
    by filter_editor on Monday June 24, @09:18AM (#93)
    User #30 Info | http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/wentworth.html
    As MIT's Frank Field [mit.edu] points out, Rick Forno has already published a response [theregister.co.uk] to this article, and The Register has commenced analysis [theregister.co.uk].
    Oops (Score:1)
    by filter_editor on Monday June 24, @09:38AM (#94)
    User #30 Info | http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/wentworth.html
    Okay, so maybe I should read more closely...you all already knew this!
    Collision Course (Score:1)
    by bwtaylor on Monday June 24, @12:48PM (#95)
    User #184 Info
    It is pretty clear that individual rights and digital rights management are on a collision course. Ultimately, the only hope DRM has is if Congress mandates it. The entertainment industry knows this and is lobbying heavily. It goes without saying that anybody who values their own freedom should oppose DRM.

    If this happens, I predict that the battles over whether it is constitutional will ultimately be decided in favor of DRM (even though I think that on the merits DRM should lose). If it gets to that point the stage will be set for the second great prohibition rebellion, because I just don't see people in a nation whose core value is freedom accepting having that freedom "managed" by Microsoft.

    Internationally, DRM will spur more countries to adopt pro-open source laws, as there is no way that many coutries will accept Microsoft as the arbitor of "trust". This will happen occasionally as outright mandates or more often as preferential or exclusive government software platform policies. Oddly, I have a feeling that such moves will eventually be the deciding factor that causes DRM to fail.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]