Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Opening Brief Filed in Intel Email "Trespass" Case
posted by filter_editor on Friday May 17, @12:21PM
from the free-speech-or-trespass? dept.
Censorship Last we heard, the California Supreme Court decided to hear Intel v. Hamidi, which like Eldred v. Ashcroft has been fought in part with the help of the Berkman Center's Openlaw forum. (See previous Greplaw post.) At issue: whether former Intel employee Ken Hamidi's sending of email messages to the company's current employees is protected speech or, as the company claims, "trespass to chattels."

Yesterday, the opening brief was filed. Check it out here


Among the issues the brief raises:
  • Should California trespass law maintain a distinction between trespass to chattel and trespass to real property, such that e-mail messages that cause no physical disruption to the computer equipment that receives them may not constitute an actionable trespass to chattel?
  • Should California tort law maintain a clear dichotomy between nuisance and trespass law when dealing with intangible intrusions, such that e-mail messages that cause no physical disruption to the computer equipment that receives them may not constitute an actionable trespass to chattel?
  • If physically non-disruptive e-mail messages may support an action for trespass to chattel, does the judicial enforcement of an injunction against the sender of the e-mail messages violate California and federal labor law when the content of the messages involves workplace concerns?
  • If physically non-disruptive e-mail messages may support an action for trespass to chattel, does the judicial enforcement of an injunction against the sender of the e-mail messages constitute state action that must comply with the free speech guarantees of the California and United States Constitutions?

Anti-Abortion Site Held Unlawful Threat by 9th Circuit | GILC Opposes EU Anti-Terror Law  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • Intel
  • The Berkman Center
  • Intel v. Hamidi
  • Eldred v. Ashcroft
  • Openlaw
  • previous Greplaw post
  • More on Censorship
  • Also by filter_editor
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Opening Brief Filed in Intel Email "Trespass" Case | Login/Create an Account | Top | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]