Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
The Quest for Hacktivism
posted by md on Saturday April 20, @05:13PM
from the the-empire-strikes-hack dept.
Civil Liberties mpawlo writes "Some food for thought was published by The Register today. 'Cult of the dead cow' wrote an article on 'Hacktivism', i e "using technology to advance human rights through electronic media". Hacktivism could be problematic from a policy perspective, but could also prove to be extremely useful when promoting human rights in a digital environment. If I recall it right, even Amnesty International have practiced Hacktivism to a certain amount. You can read article on hacktivism."

Pa. Court: Website Not Enough for Personal Jurisdiction | Peru Weighs GNU GPL law  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • mpawlo
  • read article on hacktivism
  • More on Civil Liberties
  • Also by md
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The Quest for Hacktivism | Login/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    cDc (Score:2, Insightful)
    by Kolya (kmcroberNO@SPAMlaw.harvard.edu) on Saturday April 20, @07:33PM (#55)
    User #20 Info
    I went to high school with cDc folks when they were starting to organize and get (relatively) serious. I have a hard time taking their self-professed humanitarian motivation seriously. They're great guys, but this isn't the first time an attractive and beneficial cause has happened to present a timely justification for pranksterism and clever hacks.

    A few years ago, they went to DefCon to release Back Orifice, which they billed as a "security tool" to help admins plug cracks, or alternately as a productivity tool to let users control their PCs remotely. It was a hack, obviously - the fact that it could be bundled as a trojan and run without a user's permission was pretty clearly the prime feature. The press attention they got was mixed, but they never took it too seriously (the official release announcement at DefCon involved throwing raw meat into the audience).

    I doubt this is being treated any more seriously. I'm sure the cDc crew honestly believe in democritization through hacktivism, but it's always been a justification rather than a motive cause.

    I'm willing to admit that groups like cDc can do good work through hacktivism, but I'd need to see some more concrete examples of what they're doing first. I haven't seen any exploits that actually had a positive impact; the only examples I've seen posted are the typical "GWD 0wnz j00" slogans slapped on hacked websites.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]