Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Authors Group Admonishes Amazon for Selling Used Books Online
posted by md on Tuesday April 16, @11:06AM
from the what's-that-about-first-use-doctrine dept.
Copyright Author trade group the Author's Guild last week called for a boycott of online bookseller Amazon.com because of Amazon's practice of selling used books alongside its new ones. The Guild apparently considers it unfair to use authors' own works (the new books) to attract sales of used books, for which the authors do not receive any financial remuneration beyond what the original buyer paid. Amazon fought back yesterday by calling on its users [Newsbytes coverage] to push back against the Guild's claims, with CEO Jeff Bezos arguing that the sale of used books actually helps authors by expanding the distribution of books to those who might not otherwise buy them, but for the price.

Google Bites Scientology Back After Receiving Warnings | Supreme Court: First Amendment Protects Virtual Porn Appearing to Show Minors  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • Author's Guild
  • called for a boycott
  • calling on its users [Newsbytes coverage]
  • More on Copyright
  • Also by md
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Authors Group Admonishes Amazon for Selling Used Books Online | Login/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Industry groups (Score:1)
    by md on Tuesday April 16, @11:21AM (#52)
    User #17 Info | http://www.mcdproductions.com/
    This is yet another example of an industry group speaking for its members when it probably shouldn't. Just last week the ABA threatened to go on record in favor of copyright extension, and some months ago, certain trade groups were taking sides in the Sklyarov case. I wonder how many people are really involved in these promulgations of group opinion. Probably less than a handful.
    Re:Industry groups (Score:1)
    by Kolya (reversethis-{ude.dravrah.wal} {ta} {reborcmk}) on Saturday April 20, @04:59PM (#54)
    User #20 Info
    More than that, I'd think. Even if the group opinions aren't entirely accurate or representative of their members, it blocks out the issues in (relatively) clear interest group fronts. Recording artists for pay-for-play, recording executive against. Hardware manufacturers for regional encoding, software gurus against. It may not be the best way to express the positions of the groups' members, but it does frame the issue pretty well for people who wouldn't otherwise pay attention to individual stances.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]