Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
Rod Dixon on Birth of Property Rights for Domains
posted by mpawlo on Friday May 07, @02:57AM
from the take-this-domain-name-and-run dept.
Domain Names jbc writes "From a recent CircleID story: "In Kremen v. Cohen, a federal appellate court accepted the view that a domain name is "property" and that domain name registrars should be held liable for the conduct of third-parties when a third-party interferes with the property interests of a domain name registrant by stealing their domain name. What is remarkable about the decision is its far-reaching implications and its potentially severe impact upon domain name registrars. Undoubtedly, there have been numerous claims that registrars were pilfering from individual domain name holders with impunity, and that domain name holders were clamoring for a legal remedy. In those instances, holding registrars directly liable for their illicit conduct is clearly sensible. The question remains, however, whether the court's ruling regarding registrar liability for the conduct of a third-party is a prudent and sensible response to domain name theft? I am doubtful...""

Comments on Cognitive Radio Policies | Google & Anti-Semitism  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • recent CircleID story
  • More on Domain Names
  • Also by mpawlo
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Rod Dixon on Birth of Property Rights for Domains | Login/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Probably Right (Score:1)
    by TomWiles on Thursday May 20, @10:16AM (#1534)
    User #396 Info
    The problem is that the Registrars abused their position. What happens is a case (or new rule or law) which over reacts to the problem and goes too far.

    Had the Registrar's delt responsibly with this problem in the first place, the courts would have cut them more slack, and this ruling would not have been necessary.

    It will be interesting and enlightening to observe the fallout from this.

    Tom

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]