Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
ADA does not apply to web sites
posted by macgill on Monday October 21, @05:09PM
from the something-must-be-done-even-if-this-ain't-it dept.
News

Southwest Airlines won its motion to dismiss a lawsuit attempting to apply the American's with Disabilities Act ("ADA") to web sites. Judge Seitz's (Southern District of Florida) ruling is available in PDF [not viewable through screen readers -- I wonder if the Court understands this addition of insult to injury].


The plaintiffs in this suit alleged that Southwest's web site was unreadable to blind people (even using screen readers). Among other things, plaintiffs alleged that Southwest didn't use ALT tags for image elements. As a result, plaintiffs argued that Southwest's web site violated the ADA's anti-discrimination provisions for "places of public accommodation."

The Court ruled that it could not construe the ADA concept of "places of public accommodation" to include web sites. Regarding plaintiffs alternative argument, that Southwest's web site's faulty construction denied them access to a physical space other than the web site itself, the Court ruled that plaintiffs had not established any relationship between the Southwest web site and denial of access to a physical space. [In a footnote, the Court notes that aircraft are explicitly exempt from Title III of the ADA. See fn 12 (citing 42 U.S.C. 12181(10)).]

The design of accessible web sites is incredibly important and yet very few people / corporations / educational institutions do it well (or even passably). As the web becomes an increasingly essential facility to living -- from books only available online, to travel deals requiring online purchase, to university application, enrollment or classes available only online -- lack of universal accessibility is one of the widening divides that more investment in infrastructure cannot bridge. No amount of donated computers will rewrite popular web sites in a way in which all can access. And, since accessibility engineering gets harder as time progresses, doing it right the first time is very important.

I am an offender myself and am trying to mend my ways, but do as I say not as I do. In that respect you should:

  1. Separate format from content. Content management systems, such as Moveable Type, help because they force people to concentrate on content and format separately from the content of their sites. Also they make updating a site's format easier even for older content. Ideally though, content should be transformed for different user agents. This does not mean that accessible sites have to be boring, only that their functionality should degrade gracefully.
  2. Don't rely on your audience having a particular client, or sense. The Microsoft-critical horde is quick to understand that control of the platform allowed Microsoft to "break" competing applications and ensures that Microsoft applications are very tough to "port" to other OSes. The same is true of sites that rely on proprietary browser extensions to standards or on particular senses. If you rely on Internet Explorer's special mark up to make your web site's readable, you will "break" Mozilla users' experience. If you rely on sight by not providing ALT tags, visually impaired users will have a very tough time using their "porting" tools, such as screen readers, to "port" your site so that they can experience it. In both cases, it is not just your potential users who are losing, you are also diminishing the universality of access to information. You are becoming the Microsoft that the DOJ has been chasing for years. Validate, validate, validate.
  3. Go low tech. The best way to fix your site is to try to think about it from the point of view of each of your potential users, including those who are visually or otherwise impaired. That can be very difficult, but a good proxy is to try viewing your site with a text based browser such as Lynx. Lynx is freely available on a multitude of platforms and it will only take a few seconds for you to have a better idea of how your site looks to others. You can also use the lynx web viewer.
  4. Listen carefully. If someone takes the time to tell you that your web site is hard for them to use, there are probably hundreds of people that had the same reaction but, instead of telling you, just stopped using your site.

For further reading consider:

The Court's final footnote is worth repeating here:

Given the number of visually impaired persons who utilize the Internet for commerce, and the significant amount of business that Southwest obtains through its Internet website, it is unfortunate that that parties have not cooperated to develop a creative solution that benefits both parties and which avoids the costs and polarizing effects of litigation. It is especially surprising that Southwest, a company which prides itself on its consumer relations, has not voluntarily seized the opportunity to employ all available technologies to expand accessibility to its website for visually impaired customers who would be an added source of revenue. That being said, in light of the rapidly developing technology at issue, and the lack of well-defined standards for bringing a virtually infinite number of Internet websites into compliance with the ADA, a precondition for taking the ADA into "virtual" space is a meaningful input from all interested parties via the legislative process. As Congress has created the statutorily defined rights under the ADA, it is the role of Congress, and not this Court, to specifically expand the ADA's definition of "public accommodation" beyond the physical, concrete places of public accommodation, to include "virtual" places of public accommodation.

Eminently reasonable advice. Each web site ought to address accessibility. Industry as a whole ought to develop better standards, or more reliably implement the standards that already exist. And, if neither of those happen, then Congress ought to find some consensus and act.

Ashcroft v. FSC Applied | Richard Stallman: Can You Trust Your Computer?  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • ALT tags
  • ADA's anti-discrimination provisions
  • 42 U.S.C. 12181(10)
  • offender
  • Moveable Type
  • Validate
  • validate
  • validate
  • Lynx
  • lynx web viewer
  • Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
  • section on access
  • Ethics and Law on the Electronic Frontier Policy and Technology of Copyright Control
  • Universal Access and Universal Service: Lowering the Barriers to Entry into Cyberspace
  • Web Log
  • Accessibility Section
  • How people with disabilities use the web
  • Web Accessibility Center
  • Dive Into Accessibility
  • Southwest Airlines
  • American's with Disabilities Act
  • ruling
  • screen readers
  • More on News
  • Also by macgill
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ADA does not apply to web sites | Login/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Strange Interpretation (Score:1)
    by bwtaylor on Monday October 21, @09:23PM (#423)
    User #184 Info
    I'm rather baffled by this judge's reading of the statute. I might expect SWA to prevail eventually if they could show that blind people can use SWA's travel services by calling a phone number, but to dismiss the case on this reading of the statute seems untenable to me. In fact it seems blockheaded.

    The court seems to ignore 42 USC 12181(7)(F) which lists the following among severa types of "public accommodations"
    a laundromat, dry-cleaner, bank, barber shop, beauty shop, travel service, shoe repair service, funeral parlor, gas station, office of an accountant or lawyer, pharmacy, insurance office, professional office of a health care provider, hospital, or other service establishment

    It seems to me this judge misreads the basic statute as well 42 USC 12182(a):
    No individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.

    The "place of accommodation" in this case is Southwest Airlines itself, in-so-far as it provides "travel services" per 42 USC 12181(7)(F). The website is not the "place of accommodation", but rather is one of the "services" provided by the place of accommodation.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]