|
Culture and Creativity
|
Login/Create an Account
| Top
| 4 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think your comments are a little unfair on the authors - at least they are moving outside the first amendment/free speech idea that is oh-so-prevalent in the academic literature in the area. It just seems a shame that when they say we should go 'back to basics' on the copyright principles they don't expand on how that might be done, or what the result might be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the article and it is better than most I have read in this new field of legal discussion. However, I still think it would be good if scholars tried to move outside of the Lessig frame sometime. I am sure Larry would agree .-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto on the Lessigocentricism of the article, ditto on the apologies to the Great L for blaspheming.
The one thing I really really liked about the article was the GRAPHICS -- very very trippy... the DMCA's effect on copyright's scope has never been better illustrated by 3-D textured enveloped spheres. There's some creativity for ya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
