Login/New-Account | Search | Submit a Story! | Greplaw!??
 
GrepLaw
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Messages
- Topics
- Authors

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story
- XML/RSS

GrepLaw
This site is a production of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Please email if you have questions, contributions, or ideas about improving this site.

F & F
Family

Friends

 
IP Section of ABA to Defend Copyright Extension Act
posted by filter_editor on Friday April 12, @10:16AM
from the we're-not-about-to-bite-that-hand dept.
Copyright The Intellectual Property Section of the American Bar Association recently came out in support of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA), announcing that it is preparing an amicus brief for the Supreme Court hearing of Eldred v. Ashcroft.

Now, Jamie Love of the Consumer Project on Technology has investigated further (a la Opensecrets.org), discovering that the ABA group pushing for this includes a number of folks who represent the motion picture, music and publishing industries. The upshot is that these are the people who make a living representing the companies that make a living through the CTEA. Not that there's anything wrong with that.


They are:
  • Judy Saffer (assistant general counsel, BMI)
  • Donna Gies (West Publishing)
  • Mary L. Kevlin (Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, a firm that represents Columbia Pictures, Universal Studios, Random House, BMG Entertainment, RCA Records, Sony Music and others)
  • Hayden Gregory (legislative consultant, former chief counsel of the House Judiciary subcommittee on intellectual property)
  • Mike Jakes (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, a firm that represents Walt Disney)
  • Cynthia Kernick (Reed Smith, represented eight movie studios in the ICraveTV suit)
  • Gale R. (Pete) Peterson (head of the intellectual property law department of the San Antonio firm of Cox & Smith)

(Incidentally, Love maintains a list-serve called "Random Bits" through which he occasionally serves up these tid-bits. You can subscribe here.)

"Censored" Article on Free Speech is Now Free | Google Bites Scientology Back After Receiving Warnings  >

 

 
GrepLaw Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • subscribe here
  • American Bar Association
  • CTEA
  • announcing
  • Eldred v. Ashcroft
  • Consumer Project on Technology
  • Opensecrets.org
  • More on Copyright
  • Also by filter_editor
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    IP Section of ABA to Defend Copyright Extension Act | Login/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Thankfully, not! (Score:1)
    by wendy on Monday April 15, @01:27PM (#50)
    User #39 Info
    According to another update, the ABA Board of Governors did not vote to submit an anti-public-domain amicus brief. According to Jamie Love: "The ABA just wrote to say: 'the Board of Governors of the ABA declined to adopt policy on this issue earlier today at its meeting in Chicago. Therefore, no amicus brief will be filed.'" Be thankful for small favors.

    Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. - Isaac Asimov

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]